Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit James Owens-1128509's column >>

JAMES OWENS-1128509

Journalist and Leukemia Lymphoma Soceity supporter
Articles Posted: 11  Links Seeded: 2
Member Since: 5/2009  Last Seen: 6/07/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Senate Republicans unjustly punishing the unemployed

Tue Jul 6, 2010 9:46 AM EDT
senate, politics, republicans, unemployed, unemployment-benefits
By James Owens-1128509
Advertise | AdChoices

A lesson I learned early in life is you don’t kick someone who is already down. Never, in our nation’s history has unemployment benefits been denied when jobs are so difficult to find. The national unemployment rate stands at 9.7 percent. For every job that becomes available there are at least five people applying. Yet, some politicians, like Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle maintain that unemployment insurance makes people lazy and they don’t look for work. If that statement were true there would not be five applications for every job.

The best way to deal with the Republican’s obstructionist politics about unemployment insurance is to un-employ them. Voters should stand united against the obstructionists in voting booths this November.

Actually, the Senate’s actions are not meant to punish the unemployed but to secure their own futures. The Senate Republicans believe if they obstruct the other party’s efforts to turn the economy around they can win back a majority in Congress and the presidency. This winning back, what they believe was unjustly taken away from them, is all they seem to care about. They have forgotten they are in Washington to represent us, not their own interests.

The Democrats are guilty of much the same, but at least they seem to have a hearts beating in the chests, and they can see the bigger picture. Virtually every study done has shown unemployment benefits have little, if any, effect on people looking for work. Yet the Republicans use this as an excuse. They use this excuse because they have no solid reason to justify their actions.

They also believe that if they say if loud enough and often enough people will begin to believe them; it has worked in the past. It worked in Iraq. Remember Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and most of the rest of the GOP telling the nation about the dangers Saddam posed with weapons of mass destruction? They presented charts and graphs and intelligence reports to back their claims, which turned out to be fabrications.

They were lying then and they are lying now. This time, however, instead of using Saddam as a scapegoat, they are using the unemployed. These obstructionists have no conscience or real plan for America; they only want to stop American from succeeding, and they want to do that because the Democrats and President Obama will get take credit for it. If Republicans had an ounce of fairness or any foresight they would realize they too, could take credit for economic recovery, but they don’t want to share the limelight, even if it helps the people they represent.

How many jobs have we actually lost? Well, if the private sector added 218,000 new jobs per month from this point forward, it would take five years to fill the void left by the Great Recession, according to a Center for American Progress study. Yet, the Senate Republicans would have us believe the unemployed are lazy and there are plenty of jobs out there if only they would get up from their lazyboy chairs and look for them.

As of June 4, about 1.2 million unemployed people lost benefits, thanks to Senate Republicans. Before summer's end, labor statistics project that number would increase to 3 million.

Economists agree across the board that unemployment insurance in a critical component of any serious effort to hamper harmful economic hardships brought on by a recession. They also agree that denying benefits removes billions of dollars from the economy. That’s billions of dollars spent on food, rent, clothing, medical benefits, car payments and fuel – some of the staples of our economy. Taking that money out of circulation not only hurts the unemployed but it endangers those who have remained employed because the need for many services drops off as people run out of money.

A January CNN poll showed 83 percent of Americans approved of unemployment insurance and health insurance for those who lost their jobs through no fault of their own. A recent Hart Research study asked the question “With unemployement close to ten percent and million still out of work, is it too early to start cutting back benefits and health coverage for workers who lost their jobs.” To that question, 74 percent of those polled agreed it is too early to pull the plug.

We hear Congress throwing around the term, “the American people want,” but the fact of the matter is, they either don’t know or don’t care what the American people want. If they knew what the American people wanted they would not be punishing the unemployed.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • James Owens-1128509's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Orlando/Daytona Beach/Melbourne
  • Public Discussion (63)
Tony-1517948

I'll just ask one question......these benefits have been paid for well over a year. We can't afford to just keep paying in perpetuity. The treasury is broke.....so.....how long would you suggest we pay them, and where do we get the funds from?

I'll hang up now and listen for my answer ;)

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 10:09 AM EDT
lovetocook74

it's Bush's fault. /s :)

    #1.1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 11:21 AM EDT
    James Owens-1128509

    We pay unemployment benefits until the the percentages get better, and they will, they always have. In 1959 jobless benefits were paid until the unemployment rate went below six percent, in 1963, 5.0 percent; in 1977 6.8 percent; in 1994, 7.2 percent and in 2003 they were paid until the rate reached 5.8 percent. Economists tell us you cannot take money out of circulation during a recession because it causes more jobs to be lost. Maybe I should answer your question of where we should get the money from by asking you, where do we get the billions each year for the useless war we are fighting in Afghanistan - a war we cannot win?

    I am lucky, in that, we can survive on my wife's income, but others are not so lucky and unemployment is all they have. Another question, what shall we do with those folks, allow them to become homeless? Who supports them at that point? We do, one way or the other, we do support them. The Congressman voting against this are not concerned with the deficit, or they would find a way out of a useless war. Another question: We hear a lot about the unemployed being lazy and that's why we shouldn't support them. Why are we not hearing this about single mother's on welfare, or people receiving food stamps? Answer, because it doesn't need extra funding yet.

      #1.2 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 12:51 PM EDT
      Tony-1517948

      We pay unemployment benefits until the the percentages get better

      At some point, you have to do something different instead of waiting around for a job to come back that may not be coming back. We simply can't keep paying.

      Maybe I should answer your question of where we should get the money from by asking you, where do we get the billions each year for the useless war we are fighting in Afghanistan - a war we cannot win?

      I can tell you EXACTLY where we get the billions for this little endeavor - we borrow it from China and Japan! And while I agree that the war (especially Iraq) hasnt been good for the American proverbial wallet, I would argue that if we leave and let the Taliban take over Afghanistan again, it would lead to a senseless amount of killings that could have been prevented. We broke it. We fix it. Whether you agree with the premise or not.

      Sorry friend, I have to disagree. We can't pay unemployment in perpetuity. I say if you haven't found something in 2 years, you move to where the jobs are. At some point, it has to be cut off. That's not being heartless, that's providing help and realizing that at some point, it goes beyond help.

      • 4 votes
      #1.3 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 1:12 PM EDT
      Steve Watts

      Economists tell us you cannot take money out of circulation during a recession because it causes more jobs to be lost.

      Well said. This is the point I've been trying to get across on another thread dealing with the same issue. Yes, we have a deficit. Yes, that's a problem. But yes, adding a relatively small amount to that deficit is an acceptable (and I would argue, necessary) step if the government wants the deficit paid back in any kind of timely fashion.

      The line of logic isn't too complicated. If hundreds of thousands of Americans suddenly have their lifeline clipped, they will at the very least become more frugal spenders. That means less money will be pumped back into the economy through businesses. Those businesses will then be paying fewer tax dollars to the government. Some of those businesses may need to downgrade or lay off employees. Then those employees will be paying less in taxes, and towards businesses, and the cycle repeats.

      Is everyone seeing the ripple effects here? Unemployment extensions help keep the wheels of capitalism moving until the economy is stable enough to handle it on its own. The Republicans are not only screwing over hundreds of thousands of Americans -- they're hurting themselves by removing the mechanisms by which the deficit would get paid back. If the deficit is the primary concern, they should be eager to keep Americans spending.

      It's not as if Democrats didn't make concessions. They slashed the proposal by half, then they slashed the proposed deficit by almost 3/4 by paying for parts of it with existing stimulus money as the Republicans wished. It wasn't good enough. Compromises never are for the modern-day GOP.

      • 1 vote
      #1.4 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 1:34 PM EDT
      oldmustang42

      James,

      You say the government will stop the 'emergency extensions' when the unemployment rate falls to a certain level. Lets assume that level is 6%, further, lets assume that 1 year from today the unemployment rate hits 6%.

      You say these benefits are needed to keep people from losing everything, yet some people within that 6% will be surviving on 'unemployment extensions'. Aren't they still in danger of losing everything? Why is it social acceptable to stop their benefits with unemployment at 6%, but not at 10%?

      I would guess it's because your faux humanitarian outrage is nothing more than a thinly veiled political agenda. You complain that the Republicans are playing with these people's lives, yet you are willing to cast them aside once they are no longer of political benefit to you.

      • 2 votes
      #1.5 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 9:49 AM EDT
      Reply
      GaryColumbus

      Send a statement in retaliation to make Republican incumbents unemployed and not vote in other neocons this November. If the Repukes get any additional seats in the House or Senate things will get worse. Not one Republican has done anything to make things better. They are all still living in the Bush era. The Party of No should get NO VOTES.

        Reply#2 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 10:14 AM EDT
        Julianna-Colorado

        The half-truth's are pretty much the norm around here so I suppose I am wasting my time, but... as I understand the situation, the Republican's want to use unspent, existing stimulus money to fund the extension of unemployment benefits while the Democrats want to create new debt to fund unemployment extensions. Both parties appear to be playing politics. Please correct me if I am wrong.

        • 5 votes
        #2.1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 10:53 AM EDT
        Bubba-939441

        Wait, didn't Obama promise to reduce unemployment? His term is nearly half over. Maybe it's the Dems we should vote out.

        • 3 votes
        #2.2 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 11:28 AM EDT
        fishermanpat

        Why would you punish the republicans in congress while it has been the democrats policies that have put our country where it is today? The dems have controlled congress since 2006, well before the meltdown and it has been the policies of Pelosi, Reid, Dodd and Franks especially that have put us on this path to poverty. The Oval office doesn't control spending, the congress does, so go after the policy makers there. Or maybe you're just blind to the facts.

        • 5 votes
        #2.3 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 11:33 AM EDT
        TheyreAllCrooks


        Why would you punish the republicans in congress while it has been the democrats policies that have put our country where it is today?

        Really? You can't possibly be serious (then again maybe you are) but it was the massive deregulation of the financial markets that led to this economic sh*thole we're in now!

        You do realize that fewer jobs were created between 2000-20008 than in any other time since The Great Depression! The biggest reason the "recovery" is taking so long is because we've outsourced all the jobs!

        • 2 votes
        #2.4 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 12:28 PM EDT
        James Owens-1128509

        I could not agree more.

        • 2 votes
        #2.5 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 12:52 PM EDT
        fishermanpat

        The deregulation is part of Barney Fwanks and friends ploy to keep the people that could not afford homes buy homes and get loans. Look at the facts. Bush even tried to warn of the impending problems by allowing people to buy that could not afford, but Fwanks went on national tv telling people that Fannie and Freddie were just fine and needed no further regulations. Get real folks.

        • 1 vote
        #2.6 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 2:40 PM EDT
        DEVIL1

        Fewer jobs created,is that right?How about 2000-2008 average unemployment 5 3/4%.How many jobs more jobs were needed??Ther are people that can't or won't work.As Ms.Julianna said use the un-used TARP money.We can't keep writing checks just because we have checks.The liberal mind is just too small to grasp the theory of ,you can't spend what you don't have.That's why they and their leaders in congress will be gone in November.Back on the sidelines to whine.

        • 3 votes
        #2.7 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 2:45 PM EDT
        fishermanpat

        Excellent post Devil1. Common sense dictates that you are right, but this administration would probably sue if they thought some of us were capable of using common sense so best that we be careful. Good job.

        • 2 votes
        #2.8 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 2:49 PM EDT
        James Owens-1128509

        Why don't we address the blank check Congress continually writes to support the War in Afghanistan? How about the plasma television sets, popcorn machines and so forth taxpayers pay for Congressman to use in the offices? How about the billions we have given away in farm subsidies, paying farmers "not" to farm their land. We can pay some people not to work, but cannot pay unemployment insurance to people who lost their jobs.

        And as for the unemployment rate between 2000-2008, that rate rose during the Bush Administration from 4.0 in 2000 to over seven percent by the end of December 2008. When Obama took the oath of office in January 2009 the unemployment rate had increased to more than 7.5 percent. Devil1, the 5.4 you present is a misleading average, and you know it. You can say people like myself are "too small to grasp the theory," but the fact of the matter is I recognize how you have skewed the statistics to suit your argument. The first seven years, 2000, through 2007, the employment rate continually rose slightly, however, from May 2008 to January 2009 the rate went from about 5.5 to over 7.5 - two percentage points in the last seven months of the Bush Administration. People such as yourself like to talk about lowering the deficit, but when you are in power, you do quite the opposite. To put in bluntly, but nicely, you are full of poop.

          #2.9 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 6:46 PM EDT
          DEVIL1

          OK James,the unemployment average was 5.75% not skewed,between 2000-2008 Fact.I didn't say anything regarding rising or falling I said what it was.Between 2008-2009 it jumped as it did world wide.Sometime in the near future all the blame you're humping on Bush, just to cover the fact that you elected an empty suit,\ and your buddy Dobbs and the Banking Queen Franks had a lot to do with it. Also it will come to light that this was something that the European banking industry will take a fall for.Or at least their share.As for your last sentence,classy as only a liberal could be.

            #2.10 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 7:02 PM EDT
            James Owens-1128509

            I didn't vote for Obama, but he is our president, and his ability to lead is being hampered by those who want him to fail. The fact of the matter is, if he fails so does the rest of the country.

              #2.11 - Thu Jul 8, 2010 7:15 AM EDT
              Reply
              usa1

              I always hear or see the argument that the unemployed are abusing the system, yet most of the same people with that logic will defend corporate and financial CEOS 10s of millions bonuses. Defending the bonuses as the reward of showing a profit to the shareholders, where in most cases the profits can directly be attributed to down sizing and shipping these jobs overseas.

              How someone can justify these bonuses yet not only discard the same people these CEOS put on the unemployment lines, they are now calling them bums and the CEOs heros.

              Still demanding tax cuts which will only reflect in less tax on these bonuses and eliminating what ever safety net these displaced workers had

              • 2 votes
              Reply#3 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 10:46 AM EDT
              James Owens-1128509

              I am always intrigued by the statement "cut taxes, less government." When you don't have enough money you cannot afford to ask for less. Trickle down economics has always worked well for the wealthy and kept the poor in their place.

                #3.1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 12:55 PM EDT
                oldmustang42

                Trickle down economics has always worked well for the wealthy and kept the poor in their place.

                What exactly has welfare done to end urban blight or poverty in the US? By your logic, there should be no poverty in the US because we have been throwing money at the problem for over 40 years.

                • 2 votes
                #3.2 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 2:11 PM EDT
                James Owens-1128509

                Welfare has done little or nothing to raise people out of poverty; it was not meant to do that. Unemployment insurance is not meant to be welfare and these extensions only kick in when the likelihood of the unemployed finding jobs is poor. Like welfare, unemployment insurance just allows people to get by, you know, eat, pay their rent and so forth. Neither program is meant to end poverty. You are responding to an issue that the above story does not address.

                  #3.3 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 6:51 PM EDT
                  usa1

                  Unemployment is needed, this is equivalent to a contract fulfillment or a golden parachute like many have. If the average worker does not have a safety net, why should they even attempt to get a mortgage buy a car or any other payment type expense.

                  Unemployment is need in an industrial and 1st world society without we will dwindle into a 2nd or 3rd world system much like India with its castes system.

                  Welfare is not unemployment and I do agree to an extent it is an abused system. There is a small percentage abusing the system, but there are many destitute and disabled (those who do not qualify for SS but yet deemed unfit to work) who need assistance.

                  A problem with welfare is the baby makers some with 10 children claiming they have a right to have children and the church tells them birth control and abortion is wrong. This the same church who will give them a pantry to shop in but has its own social workers informing these people how to apply and receive government money.

                  Churches giving advise on how to live yet falling back on the government to support their flock.

                  Not all but much welfare is the fault of the church, I do like their philosophy it is better to give than to receive, but it seems the church is doing the receiving and the taxpayers are doing the giving

                  • 1 vote
                  #3.4 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 11:32 PM EDT
                  oldmustang42

                  Colonial,

                  You are responding to an issue that the above story does not address.

                  I was responding directly to your comment. Is that not how a discussion is supposed to work?

                  usa,

                  You're right, we do need UI, but we don't need it for 2 years or more. I agree that some churches often seem willing to help their own congregation, while doing little to help other members of the community.

                  • 1 vote
                  #3.5 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 9:36 AM EDT
                  oldmustang42

                  James,

                  Sorry. I was responding to you, not the Colonial.

                    #3.6 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 9:51 AM EDT
                    Reply
                    Nottold

                    Jim I think this is an excellent article and although I've been a voting republican I'm thinking of going independent. I am so tired of hearing the republicans blast everything that isn't their idea or plan. No one wants to enlarge the country's debt but the economy doesn't' seem to be coming around and once jobs, i.e. companies are forced to downsize, those jobs just don't come back quickly when the economy improves. There are a lot of good people who want to work but can't find a job and those that are in their late 50's or early 60's have to compete with a tremendous number of college grads. Check with the latest social security figures regarding people taking early retirement at 62. It is higher than previous years and we all know why.

                      Reply#4 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 10:47 AM EDT
                      respectyourancestors

                      Thanks to George Warhead Bush, the rich are richer and the poor (enslaved whites, blacks, lationos etc) continue to spiral downward. Now, if you listen to the ignorant racist minds of Today, those who have rushed out to purchase guns and ammo because a half white/black is our President. People we need to wake up and live, see the truth and recognized that the Repulicans only want to keep us all enslaved, keeping the rich, rich and the poor, poor. (Capitalism), We all come from the Black Man. You must know that no color will exist without the foundation of BLACK. Respect

                        Reply#5 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 12:44 PM EDT
                        fishermanpat

                        You can't be serious, because if you are you must be senile. You show me how Pelosi and her husband have done any more than blow hot air to better the likes of the poor. They are getting richer by the day, and she wants more. Never before have so many people been so bamboozled by a group of people than our country has by this democratic administration. George Soros is one of Obama's biggest backers and just happens to be one of the richest men around, and Obama's policy on cap and tax will make him and his minions even richer. This bull about Bush has got to stop or you will never be able to see the truth.

                        • 2 votes
                        #5.1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 2:21 PM EDT
                        Reply
                        James Owens-1128509

                        Despite their denials, I have felt for a long while having a black man in the White-house doesn't set well with a lot of folks. I did not vote for President Obama, but today I support him and his party's efforts to right the ship. It should not matter what political party he belongs to or what color his skin is, but it does matter to a lot of people. We took one step forward by electing the first African/American president, but have followed that by showing that racism is alive and well. Like closet gays, these people are closet racists.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#6 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 1:00 PM EDT
                        fishermanpat

                        While the color of his skin may not matter to you or me, it sure does matter to him. He is without question anti-white, anti-American, and anti-democracy. Wake up people and look at the situation for what it is. If the colors of the individuals had been opposite in the police incident where a man was arrested for being out of control, would Obama stuck his nose into the situation and accused the police of acting stupidly? I don't think so. If it had been the Klan that was intimidating voters in PA with nightsticks rather than the New Black Panthers, would Holder have had the Justice Dept drop the charges,,,,I think not. Get the facts right. Obama and his admin are the racists and need to be held accountable.

                        • 1 vote
                        #6.1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 2:29 PM EDT
                        Julianna-Colorado

                        Obama skin color doesn't sit well with who? I don't know a single person in my life who mentions Obama's skin color when talking about why they are unhappy with his job performance. I would suggest you choose a better set of friends if you secretly think they are racists. If you are just speculating about the rest of us, I suppose you are entitled to your opinion. I try not to make broad statements about people I don't know, but that it just how I was raised. I really wish folks would stop assuming that just because someone has a difference of opinion politically, they must be a racist. Please.

                          #6.2 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 6:15 PM EDT
                          James Owens-1128509

                          I'm not saying everyone who is against Obama's opinions are racists, but I am saying this is a situation that does exist. To suggest racism in America does not exist would be short-sighted. And certainly, anyone who is against this man because of the color of his skin, are not going to admit it.

                          None of my friends are racists as far as I know, but I know it exists and so do you. The majority of people, whether white, black, hispanic, asian or whatever, practice ethnocentrism to some extent. In other words, most believe their religion, or race, or school, or whatever, is better than others and they do things to defend people who are like-minded or like them in other ways. This is not exactly racism; it's more like human nature However, racism does exist.

                            #6.3 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 7:01 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            oneforall

                            In 1994, the Republicans attacked the weakest and most defenseless of our society in order to gain political advantage, and it worked. They are using the same tactics now, but what they fail to realize is, times have changed - and they were the ones who changed them. The general public knows that the Republican agenda failed, and failed miserably. They are simply trying to bully their way back into control of government, even though they have done nothing to improve conditions. They are like the little boy who insists upon pouring his own glass of milk, but proceeds to spill it all over the kitchen. Unfortunately, oil is a lot harder to clean up than milk.

                              Reply#7 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 1:10 PM EDT
                              fishermanpat

                              This is blatantly a bold face lie and you know it. What attack are you talking about? You throw out accusations and generalizations with nothing to back them up, and hope we will just jump on your band wagon? I don't think so. Put up or shut up.

                              • 1 vote
                              #7.1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 2:32 PM EDT
                              Bubba-939441

                              "the Republicans attacked the weakest and most defenseless of our society"

                              Which party is in control now? Is it any better with Pelosi and Reid at the helm? What have they done for the weakest and most defenseless?

                              • 1 vote
                              #7.2 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 3:12 PM EDT
                              James Owens-1128509

                              Well let's see, they have passed health care reform and a minimum wage increase. They have also "tried" to do other things for the weaker and defenseless, but the GOP has used the filibuster to stop a vote on them.

                                #7.3 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 4:33 PM EDT
                                oneforall

                                I'm referring to welfare mothers, FMP. Where have you been, DA?

                                For one thing, Bubba, they have put food in the mouths of those whose jobs were sh*tcanned by the Republicans, until the Republicans decided that unemployed workers don't deserve to live.

                                  #7.4 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 4:39 PM EDT
                                  Bubba-939441

                                  "sh*tcanned by the Republicans"

                                  Didn't Mr Obama promise them 1.5 million new green jobs. If he'd keep his promise we wouldn't need unemployment compensation. I believe the unemployment rate after two yrs of Obama is higher than it was under Bush and the Democrats had a filibuster proof majority. It's worse now than it was under Bush.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #7.5 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 6:20 PM EDT
                                  James Owens-1128509

                                  If the Dems have had a filibuster proof majority it was for a very short period of time.

                                    #7.6 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 7:03 PM EDT
                                    oneforall

                                    I believe the unemployment rate after two yrs of Obama is higher than it was under Bush and the Democrats had a filibuster proof majority.

                                    Unemployment is like a communicable disease. If you do nothing to stop it and reverse it, it will just keep spreading. The stimulus did slow it down, but the plan was not nearly large enough or sweeping enough to make a significant difference. The current jobs bill has been blocked for weeks by Senate conservatives. Without substantial increases in spending and jobs programs, we will begin losing jobs again, probably at a more rapid pace. I spent nearly twenty years working with jobs programs, but I have never seen so little support for job creation, even for much milder recessions. This recession is much deeper and much longer than any since the depression, so if we fail to reverse direction, it will consume the nation. If we continue to lose incomes and tax revenues, paying down the deficit will be a pipe dream.

                                      #7.7 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 9:16 PM EDT
                                      Bubba-939441

                                      "paying down the deficit will be a pipe dream."

                                      A dream or a lie? Obama promised to cut it in half. You don't create jobs by raising taxes on corporations.

                                        #7.8 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 8:15 AM EDT
                                        oneforall

                                        Corporate tax rates are lower than ever. Where are the jobs?

                                          #7.9 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 12:23 PM EDT
                                          Bubba-939441

                                          "Where are the jobs?"

                                          Ask Mr Obama. He promised 1.5 million new green jobs and an unemployment rate that would not get above 8.5%.

                                            #7.10 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 2:35 PM EDT
                                            oneforall

                                            I did. This was his his reply.

                                            Dear Friend:

                                            Thank you for writing me. I have heard from many
                                            Americans who are losing their jobs and struggling to pay their bills.
                                            Every day, I meet with my economic advisors to make sure we are
                                            doing all we can to create good jobs and help Americans support their
                                            families and pursue the American Dream.

                                            The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) was
                                            the first step to spur job growth and ease the pain of unemployment.
                                            This measure was designed to save or create millions of jobs here at
                                            home in industries such as alternative energy, health care, and
                                            construction. By extending and increasing emergency unemployment
                                            compensation and increasing access to health insurance, ARRA has
                                            provided relief to millions of unemployed Americans and has helped
                                            improve our Nation's economic outlook.

                                            Many Americans, however, are still struggling to find
                                            employment and provide for their families, and I am working to
                                            promote additional job creation. To assist workers who lose their
                                            jobs, I signed into law the Worker, Homeownership, and Business
                                            Assistance Act in November, extending unemployment benefits
                                            beyond what exists in ARRA. I also signed into law an extension
                                            of COBRA benefits and partner with Congress to ensure that a safety
                                            net remains in place for those who face long-term unemployment.

                                            My Administration is also helping Americans return to work
                                            by emphasizing job training in industries that cannot be outsourced.
                                            Recently laid-off workers receiving unemployment benefits have
                                            new opportunities to pursue higher education and job training
                                            programs, including easier access to Pell Grants. To encourage job
                                            creation in the United States, I am replacing tax laws that send jobs
                                            overseas with new incentives to create them here at home. Available
                                            assistance can be found online at:
                                            www.dol.gov/recovery/implement.htm or www.opportunity.gov.

                                            Together, we can help more Americans find and keep good jobs and
                                            enjoy a healthy standard of living. To locate an employment center
                                            near you, select your state at: www.dol.gov/dol/location.htm.
                                            For information on benefits and opportunities for those out of work, I
                                            encourage you to visit: www.dol.gov/dol/audience/aud-
                                            unemployed.htm. To find career resources, you may call 1-877-872-
                                            5627 or visit: www.careeronestop.org. While it will take time to turn
                                            our economy around, I am confident that, working together, we will
                                            emerge from this crisis stronger than before.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            Barack Obama

                                              #7.11 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 2:50 PM EDT
                                              Bubba-939441

                                              1.5 million green jobs not addressed. Deficit reduction not addressed.

                                                #7.12 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 2:56 PM EDT
                                                oneforall

                                                What can I say? I have no interest in defending Obama's record or lack of accomplishments any more than those of the Democrats, Republicans, Conservatives, or Liberals. Their behaviors and their records must stand on their own. My only interest is in getting someone, anyone, to produce some results.

                                                  #7.13 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 3:12 PM EDT
                                                  James Owens-1128509

                                                  Amen!

                                                    #7.14 - Thu Jul 8, 2010 7:17 AM EDT
                                                    Reply
                                                    BKER1492

                                                    "Never, in our nation’s history has unemployment benefits been denied when jobs are so difficult to find."

                                                    That would be our nations history since 1959, which is the first time Unemployment benefits were extended, and than stopped. We didn't have benefits of any kind before 1935.

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    Reply#8 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 1:12 PM EDT
                                                    James Owens-1128509

                                                    You are correct. Unemployment insurance has only been in existence for75 years, but the statement you mentioned above is still true.

                                                    It was created during the Great Depression, now during the "Great Recession," they would like to take it away.

                                                      #8.1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 4:35 PM EDT
                                                      Reply
                                                      RBurn

                                                      "He is without question anti-white, anti-American, and anti-democracy."

                                                      Fishermanpat-

                                                      You have to be a typical Republican. You talk about Obama being anti-white, anti-American and anti-democracy. What the hell do you think the GOP is. They think the only thing a minority can do is vote for them and keep their mouth shut. And you can't get anymore anti-American then voting against anything and everything that the opposing paarty wants to do. They have killed and stopped more bills in congress simply cause it wasn't their idea.All they give a damn abouit is get Obama at any cost. It's people like you and your GOP that their is such a word as anti democratic, Wake Up!!

                                                        Reply#9 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 5:23 PM EDT
                                                        fishermanpat

                                                        Your kind brought Obama into power, it will my kind to take him out of power. We, thankfully have people in this country that can still think, unlike you. I am an independant and have voted both ways. I take a man at his word, and this man in power right now has never kept a single promise. We now see that his administration is involved in abuse of power at the DOJ with the NBP party case. Love to see that be the end of them and it might be for Holder. You say they are the party of no. Bullchit and you know it. They are trying to keep this madman from breaking our bank completely and you know that too, but fail to mention it. Get real.

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #9.1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 5:29 PM EDT
                                                        James Owens-1128509

                                                        Your kind, my kind? This is part of what is wrong with America today, we don't see differences of opinions as a failure to agree, we see each other as almost enemies. We are all Americans aren't we?

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #9.2 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 7:06 PM EDT
                                                        fishermanpat

                                                        We are all Americans aren't we?

                                                        That's a good question,,,and I'm not so sure anymore.

                                                          #9.3 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 10:29 PM EDT
                                                          Reply
                                                          James Owens-1128509

                                                          And that is a sad commentary fishermanpat. I saw a poll the other day asking the question, "are we headed for a civil war?" I don't know about a war, but many of us are far apart in how we are viewing the world we live in.

                                                            Reply#10 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:33 AM EDT
                                                            RBurn

                                                            Fishermanpat, you talk about taking a man at his word. Well the damn GOP promised to serve the people who voted for them. They don't give a damn about them, they gave their word. All they care about is bing in control. They don't want to work together and solve the real issues. Real life is when men disagree they set down and work it out. They don't want to work it out. The elections are more important than the real issues. Obama promises were based on the hope that maybe , must maybe working together things could get done. Take the blinders off.

                                                              Reply#11 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 10:48 AM EDT
                                                              Bubba-939441

                                                              "Obama promises were based on the hope that maybe , must maybe working together things could get done"

                                                              The Dems have had a majority for years and did nothing.

                                                                #11.1 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 2:59 PM EDT
                                                                Reply
                                                                James Owens-1128509

                                                                And we are following the road of the politicians leading us. We are a divided country conquered by no one but ourselves. But the original issue here involved the GOP's refusal to allow a vote to extend unemployment benefits. Soon, an estimated 3 million will be out of benefits, what shall we do with them - place them on welfare and medicaid, or maybe send them to Mexico for jobs - since that is where a lot of our jobs went in the first place.

                                                                  Reply#12 - Thu Jul 8, 2010 7:22 AM EDT
                                                                  oldmustang42

                                                                  The GOP isn't refusing to extend benefits to the unemployed, they simply want the money to come out of existing stimululs funds rather than to create new debt.

                                                                  Can you explain to me why the Democrats have a problem with this proposed solution.

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #12.1 - Thu Jul 8, 2010 9:11 AM EDT
                                                                  Reply
                                                                  James Owens-1128509

                                                                  No, I cannot explain why the Dems would have a problem with this solution, but maybe it's because even when the GOP comes up with compromises they still vote against them. Take a look back at the health care reform debate. The Dems caved into their demands time and time again only to get kicked in the shins for doing so. Maybe, they just are not willing to cave in any longer.

                                                                  Can you explain to me why Congress is still paying out millions of dollars each year to subsidize goat farmers who raise goats for mohair for military uniforms, when the military has not used mohair in military uniforms for more than a half century? It is someone's pork project most likely. Their are hundreds of examples of government waste such as this, and yet when it comes to an important issue they become concerned about the deficit. It's BS.

                                                                    Reply#13 - Thu Jul 8, 2010 4:53 PM EDT
                                                                    oldmustang42

                                                                    If the Dems agree to use existing stimulus money to extend UI benefits and the Repubs then choose to hold things up, then you have every right(if not an obligation) to call them on their actions. But to claim that they are refusing to extend these benefits is willfully distorting the truth to serve your own agenda.

                                                                    Yes, there are hundreds, if not thousands of examples of pork barrel projects showing government waste. I'm not here to defend the Repubs or to claim that this is some noble gesture on their part.

                                                                    So make the process as clear as possible. Put a bill on the table that only extends UI benefits, do not allow any other amendments to be added to the bill. That way when the vote is taken it is a vote for or against extending benefits and nothing else. Remove the gray areas and all we will have let is black and white.

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #13.1 - Thu Jul 8, 2010 5:09 PM EDT
                                                                    Reply
                                                                    James Owens-1128509

                                                                    I agree oldmustang42, erase the gray areas and place it on the table on its own merits -no need to rev the engine. (no pun intended) As for my agenda, I'm looking at what is fair. The money they seek for unemployment extensions is pocket change compared to other money spent, as my next article points out. My agenda I suppose is to promote both fairness and human empathy toward our own people.

                                                                    As someone pointed out to me today, there are people who find they are better off not to take a minimum wage job and give up their unemployment. This is true, these people and this situation exists, but most really need it and jobs, any kind of job, is very difficult to find. We should not punish the multitude to make an example out of the few.

                                                                      Reply#14 - Thu Jul 8, 2010 6:17 PM EDT
                                                                      sweepea-1175418

                                                                      what us wrong with you people republicans don't like you people not working---it must be your morals or something--all those people in ohio--indiana they were so worried about abortion and same sex marriage and voted their jobs right out of the pockets and into other countries--hey folks don't come west--you asked for what you got!!

                                                                        Reply#15 - Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:18 PM EDT
                                                                        James Owens-1128509

                                                                        Love you comment sweepea

                                                                          Reply#16 - Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:21 AM EDT
                                                                          Leave a Comment:
                                                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                                          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                                          Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                          FUN STUFF:
                                                                          • Leaderboard |
                                                                          • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                                          • Top of the Vine |
                                                                          • Newsvine Live |
                                                                          • Newsvine Archives |
                                                                          • The Greenhouse |
                                                                          COMPANY STUFF:
                                                                          • Code of Honor |
                                                                          • Company Info |
                                                                          • Contact Us |
                                                                          • Jobs |
                                                                          • User Agreement |
                                                                          • Privacy Policy |
                                                                          • About our ads
                                                                          LEGAL STUFF:
                                                                          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com